🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and suitable for children," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level due to national gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some figures to follow this example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and others show that states around the world are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.